http://www.edadkins.com/motu-666-and-a-half/ based on true events Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:38:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.edadkins.com/motu-666-and-a-half/#comment-1548 John Tiesi Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:42:47 +0000 http://www.edadkins.com/?p=585#comment-1548 If you live in NM it doesn't matter. Everyone is a bad driver! If you live in NM it doesn’t matter. Everyone is a bad driver!

]]> http://www.edadkins.com/motu-666-and-a-half/#comment-1547 Natalie Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:58:18 +0000 http://www.edadkins.com/?p=585#comment-1547 I have to agree with Dr. Shane. After having done quite a few ethnographic studies myself of the social use of large vehicles in American culture, I noticed that the alpha males were drawn to the larger vehicles. Consequently, these males also had the smallest testicles within the test group. I have to agree with Dr. Shane. After having done quite a few ethnographic studies myself of the social use of large vehicles in American culture, I noticed that the alpha males were drawn to the larger vehicles. Consequently, these males also had the smallest testicles within the test group.

]]> http://www.edadkins.com/motu-666-and-a-half/#comment-1546 Shane Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:39:37 +0000 http://www.edadkins.com/?p=585#comment-1546 When pondering your proposed question, I repeatedly found myself drawn to the age-old debate of nature vs. nurture. In the interest of keeping my comment at a reasonable length, I will refrain from citing my critically acclaimed 2-page Sociology 101 paper discussing this quandry that was undeservedly labeled with a B+ by an over-zealous 24 year old graduate student in the spring semester of my freshman year. To get back to the subject at hand, I find the very idea that an inanimate object could possess an inherent quality that has traditionally been reserved only to describe the emotions and characteristics of human behavior to be profoundly intriguing. On the other hand, the fundamental basis of this argument must be called into question. In summation I'll just say this: Are complete dicks drawn to huge trucks? Fo' sho. Skeet skeet skeet skeet. When pondering your proposed question, I repeatedly found myself drawn to the age-old debate of nature vs. nurture. In the interest of keeping my comment at a reasonable length, I will refrain from citing my critically acclaimed 2-page Sociology 101 paper discussing this quandry that was undeservedly labeled with a B+ by an over-zealous 24 year old graduate student in the spring semester of my freshman year. To get back to the subject at hand, I find the very idea that an inanimate object could possess an inherent quality that has traditionally been reserved only to describe the emotions and characteristics of human behavior to be profoundly intriguing. On the other hand, the fundamental basis of this argument must be called into question. In summation I’ll just say this: Are complete dicks drawn to huge trucks? Fo’ sho. Skeet skeet skeet skeet.

]]> http://www.edadkins.com/motu-666-and-a-half/#comment-1545 Pete Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:09:42 +0000 http://www.edadkins.com/?p=585#comment-1545 It's not limited to trucks. Big dicks come in all sorts of different vehicles. It’s not limited to trucks. Big dicks come in all sorts of different vehicles.

]]>